Gruther W., Wick F., Paul B., Leitner C., Posch M., Matzner M., Crevenna R., Ebenbichler G.. (2009). Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of muscle strength and endurance measurements in patients with chronic low back pain. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-0391
Read the original publication →
What this study found
This study evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and long-term reliability of common trunk muscle strength and endurance tests in patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Researchers compared isokinetic and isometric dynamometer testing against the Biering-Sørensen test (a clinical test for back muscle endurance) across CLBP patients, healthy controls, and chronic headache controls. While dynamometric measurements successfully distinguished CLBP patients from healthy controls, they demonstrated significant learning effects upon retesting three weeks later. Conversely, the Biering-Sørensen test showed outstanding diagnostic accuracy (AUC = 0.93) and remained highly stable over time with no learning effects.
Why it matters
For rehabilitation clinicians, tracking objective progress is vital. However, these findings suggest that serial dynamometric testing may artificially inflate progress reports because patients simply get better at performing the test itself. In contrast, the Biering-Sørensen test emerges as a highly reliable, accessible, and cost-effective alternative. It allows clinicians to:
- Accurately assess baseline lumbar extensor endurance without expensive equipment.
- Reliably monitor rehabilitation progress over time, free from the confounding influence of learning effects.
- Confidently design targeted trunk stabilization and endurance protocols.
Limitations
While the findings strongly support the Biering-Sørensen test, the study’s sample size was relatively small (66 participants total). Additionally, because the Biering-Sørensen test requires holding a static position to exhaustion, clinicians must still account for subjective factors like pain tolerance, fear-avoidance, and patient motivation during testing.